UnityTechLabs

A live CMMC Level 2 reference network — built and operated in the open by DATAROSS LLC

A network that is secure only while its design is secret is a network that will fail. UnityTechLabs publishes its topology, address plan, every one of its 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls with the system that implements it and the check that proves it, its scripts, its policies, its compliance score, and cryptographic proof that its audit trail is unbroken. You are invited to scrutinize all of it.

Live proof PUBLIC

CMMC L2 self-assessment
—/110
checked daily and at every build · first publish pending
Audit ledger root
— pending —
SHA-256 of a hash-chained, append-only ledger · verify below
WAN slots
—
301–305 dynamic slots · 3 active/active · metered + shaped
Hosts under enforcement
—
one function per VM · Debian/Proxmox only · iptables only · IPv6 off

These numbers are published snapshots generated by the one-way publish pipeline — this site has no live connection into the network and no server-side code.

The idea, in one table

PrincipleWhat it means here
Kerckhoffs's principleSecurity may depend on keys, never on secrecy of the design. So the design is public.
Born compliantEvery server is created by one build path that assigns identity, certificates, guard, monitoring, backup, and its CMMC controls before it takes traffic.
Fail toward reachableEvery security control can revert itself. A control that can lock out its own operators is a bigger risk than the threat it mitigates.
Generated, not writtenInventory, the System Security Plan, the POA&M, and this site are rendered from live data. Hand-written truth drifts; generated truth is checked.
Withholding is publishedIf something is hidden, the fact that it is hidden — and who, what, when, where, why, how — is public.

The design PUBLIC

Full blueprints: DR-FOUNDATION-BLUEPRINT · DR-WAN-EDGE · DR-SAFE-OPS · the 110-control matrix (links activate at first publish)

Hidden by design SECRET RESTRICTED

Transparency does not mean publishing the keys. The line is a single question: does disclosure hand an attacker a capability they did not already have? Everything below is withheld — and this register is generated from the same classification data that gates publishing, so it is always current.

WhatWho decidesWhenWhere it livesWhyHow enforced
Private keys, passwords, API tokens, MFA seeds, VPN private keysclassification rule, not a judgment callalwaysvault onlypossession = capabilitysecret scanner blocks publish; rotation on exposure
Open findings on a named host (unpatched CVE, failed control)classification rule; operator verifies the fixuntil remediation is verified (≤30 days; critical ≤7)internal docsdisclosure before the fix opens a windowauto-declassifies to a public post-mortem on verified fix
People's personal data, physical location, rack/camera/UPS placementprivacy law + physical-security controlsalwaysphysical recordstransparency cannot protect a doornever inventoried in public objects
Raw audit-log rows (full commands, operator source IPs)classification rulealwaysSIEM (authenticated)mixed contentthe site shows ledger roots and counts, never rows
Alerting phone numbers, inboxes, webhooksclassification rulealwaysconfigurationabuse vectorpublished as "SMS ×2, email ×3, chat"

Verify it yourself

  1. This site is authentic: every release ships SHA256SUMS and a signature; the signing public key is published here. (key publishes at first release)
  2. The audit trail is unbroken: the daily ledger root above is the SHA-256 head of a hash chain; a changed or deleted record changes every root after it.
  3. The compliance score is real: the score JSON lists each of the 110 controls, its implementing system, its automated check, and the last result.

Found something? Good.

Researchers, auditors, students, and adversaries are welcome. Report via /.well-known/security.txt (RFC 9116). Confirmed findings are fixed, then published as post-mortems with dates, and reporters are credited on the Hall of Fame. (security.txt and Hall of Fame publish with the first release)

Where this is going

UnityTechLabs is being established as its own IT-services company. The reference network above is the first proof; the rest is being built in this order, and nothing below is live until it says so here.

An educational libraryCase studies, runbooks and blueprints from years of real infrastructure work, rewritten for anyone under the IT umbrella — students, small-business owners, other engineers. Planned.
IT services, in the openWebsites and hosting, infrastructure, CMMC Level 2 practice for small organizations — delivered the way this site is run: documented, verifiable, no hidden dependencies. Planned.
Ask the networkA public, read-only way to query what is actually running — services, versions, checks, last results — generated from live data through the one-way publish pipeline. Planned.

Status line, kept honest: reference network — documented · library — planned · services — planned · live query — planned

Why this exists

UnityTechLabs is DATAROSS LLC's working demonstration that a small organization can run a CMMC Level 2–aligned network with a continuously self-assessed score, generated documentation, and an audit trail anyone can verify — and can do it in the open. It is the reference model for the compliance work we deliver to defense-contractor clients. It is assessment-ready and continuously self-assessed; formal CMMC Level 2 certification is conferred only by a third-party assessment, and we say so plainly.